Ready.


copycat82 Gate Problems: Input vs. Output

The output gate macros of copycat82 do not match the input macros (other than the non-exception of the ordinary Petri net join/fork, i.e: Whatever copycat82 itself implements, leads to mismatches. It is difficult, or impossible to imagine any reduction-heuristics with such un-proper "logic" macros - with their contagious problems:

e.g: input "inclusive-or" is no match to the output inclusive-OR macro - even if the latter sends out at most a single token from each path, whenever it fires.

To follow an output-OR, with input-another-OR, would be non-conservative (of the token amount). To follow an output-OR with input-XOR may deadlock. To follow an output-OR with input-AND, may wait forever, if the output-OR may enable only a single path.






Further Reading

The plagiarism of copycat82 encompasses its input-gate, and its output-gate, too.




Forum: . . (Fair Menu . . . . . Fault Report? . . . . . Remedy for your case . . . . . Noticed Plagiarism?)

Referring#: 0
Last-Revised (text) on Nov. 16, 2004 . . . that was http://www.geocities.com/ferzenr/decalun.gate.input_vs_output.htm
mirror to mid80.net, on June 17, 2009
Written by: Ahmed Ferzan/Ferzen R Midyat-Zila (or, Earth)
Copyright (c) 2004, 2009 Ferzan Midyat. All rights reserved.
mirror